|
|
This fallacy exploits the long-held prejudice that logic must be cold and
unemotional. It is able to masquerade as good reasoning because, of course, emotions can
be used to distract attention away from the issue at hand. In fact - as this entire
category of fallacies shows - there are many ways to use irrelevant emotional appeals to
distract attention away from relevant concerns. However, it is important to remember
that concern for human suffering is relevant more often than it is irrelevant. It is our
emotions, including our compassion for others, that provide us with our chief motive to
think rationally. In cases involving questions of human suffering, the plea to be
"practical," or even "logical," (i.e. unemotional), may itself
be a distraction from the issue at hand.
Curiously, the Appeal to Utility fallacy qualifies as an emotional appeal, even
though the sentiment of practicality is often invoked by claiming to despise
"emotionalism" or "sentimentality." Lack of compassion is just
as much a "sentiment" as compassion, and just as prone to be fallacious. |