|
A primary challenge facing Cuyamaca College concerns the low
success rates of young, first-year students in comparison with those
of other students. The overall impact of this problem is institution-wide
and on many levels. These young, first-time students drop out of Cuyamaca
College at a higher rate; sixty percent of these students do not come back
to the College for their second year. These students are also less likely
to progress from basic skills to collegiate-level courses, and they
have lower GPAs and higher probation rates.
Cuyamaca College is also positioning itself to address other challenges to
student success. Currently, over one-third of new students do not go through
the assessment process. There is also minimal use of the newly-established
early alert system by the faculty. The rate of degrees, certificates, and
transfers has not increased proportionate to Cuyamaca's growth in student
enrollment. Exacerbating these problems, the College does not yet have a
student tracking system, so counselors and instructors cannot effectively
monitor the progress of students as they attempt to navigate through their
crucial first year. Lastly, although student application data are available
to help identify students with particular needs, this information is not
effectively used to notify students of relevant campus resources available
to them.
An additional weakness is that staff
development programs are not accessible to all faculty. Part-time faculty
(who teach over half of all classes at the College) are at a serious
disadvantage. While there is a core group of dedicated faculty who have made
strides integrating technology into their classes, resources have dwindled
over the years and staff development programs are no longer cutting edge in
the area of technology.
Furthermore, a lack of facilities and
resources has significantly inhibited the growth and expansion of support
services and curriculum at Cuyamaca College. Counselors and other support
services have been unable to keep up with the increase in student enrollment
and demand for services. Online options for certain services are still not
available. While student enrollment continues its upward trend, the
curriculum is not fully comprehensive. Capstone classes are not offered in
key areas, causing many students to leave the College to complete their
undergraduate transfer program, resulting in a static transfer rate.
Moreover, Counselors have been unable to keep up with the increase in
student enrollment and demand for services. Many students are not aware of
the most efficient manner to progress through their required courses and
there may be unnecessary delays in degree and certificate attainment. This
is evidence in a static number of degrees and certificates awarded over the
past five years relative to student growth.
There are three major components of the Title III grant:
(1)
Faculty Training. This component of the activity is on professional development that
focuses on: helping faculty and staff identify and address the needs of
high-risk students; familiarizing instructors with diverse learning styles;
teaching faculty to integrate and utilize special software and technologies
that reach and engage high-risk students; and helping faculty to maintain
currency with new technologies in the classroom through ongoing technical
support.
(2)
Technology.
This component of the activity focuses on increasing the utilization of
technology as a tool to enhance educational programs and services so that
students persist at the College and attain their educational goals,
particularly high-risk students. This will consist of on-line access to
career and academic advising, financial aid and other services, increased
integration of technology in academic programs and an Institutional
Effectiveness System for faculty and administrators to make key decisions.
(3)
Curriculum Development.
This component of the activity will focus on ensuring a smooth transition
from one academic course level to the next, ensuring that the college
curriculum is aligned and articulated with other institutions; and ensuring
that the curriculum is comprehensive in key areas, i.e. where programs need
capstone classes and where there is an established need, such as in the
teacher preparation programs.
back to top |